Is there a hidden agenda behind these new crypto laws?

The recent crypto laws have led to a debate about their real political motivations. On July 18, 2025, the Genius Act administration represents the foundation stone of the cryptocurrency strategy.

Officially, the move aims to remove excessive administrative barriers and legalize the Stable Queens – crypto assets in support of real US assets: dollars, treasury bonds or gold.

According to lawmakers, these coins should be made easier and the United States should be kept as a global leader in digital finance. The administration has developed this legislation as a part of a comprehensive strategy to enhance financial innovation while maintaining US economic leadership.

In order to understand cryptocurrency rules in the United States, there is a need to look beyond official stories. Currently Stabon Market Charge Under this new regulatory framework, more than $ 260 billion is likely to reach $ 2 trillion by 2028. This explosive growth will primarily replace the financial landscape in ways that cannot be compatible with the objectives mentioned.

Related: hidden issues that could threaten the future of crypto

Who regularly make Crypto in the United States?

The question that organizes cryptocurrency in the United States is becoming complicated under the new legislation. It seems that the hidden agenda behind these laws weakens the control of the Federal Reserve System. As a reminder, the feed, which was founded in 1913, consists of twelve regional reserve banks and is considered a private structure free from executive power.

The prejudice to release “national money” through the feed is strongly safe, and efforts to interfere with its powers have always met with strong opposition. Understanding that what regularly enhances cryptocurrency in the United States shows the struggle for political power behind the recent laws.

The new Establishment Law represents half the measurement, as it cannot solve the work of creating an alternative digital central bank. Instead, it allows private players to release their “money” in support of government securities, which effectively breaks the monopoly of the feed on the emission.

Read more: People really care about these 3 things – do you offer them?

Stable Coin Effects as a device of political influence

The new Establishment Regulation allows private agencies to release assets such as currency through government security. It represents an important departure from the traditional monetary policy, where the currency issuance is strictly controlled by central banking authorities.

From the point of view of the Establishment Regulation, the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on the issue of currency can be broken. By allowing private companies to create dollar -backed digital assets, legislation effectively forms a parallel financial system that operates under various rules and supervision.

Critics argue that the existing stubborn regulation can create a shadow emission system beyond traditional control. This system could potentially harm the ability to effectively implement the Fed’s monetary policy and respond to economic crises.

Related: Why institutional investors accept Crypto -Tradfi Partnership

Recent legislative political agenda

Cryptocurrency behind the recent legislation is ahead of promoting political agenda. As a result, the US economic system is at risk of losing some part of its budget income and deviating from its usual path. After gaining the right to release and use business, stable queens, can avoid taxing and under the invasive rules, the stubborn will deprive himself of the outdated and confident.

You have to look at the power struggle between government agencies to understand the politics around Crypto. The hidden mini -printing creates gradual growth and shaky predictions, which is dangerous in the election year when political pressure is already high.

Some of the crypto space emphasize the reducing the control of the Federal Reserve on monetary policy. This is a major change in the financial system that has formed the United States for more than 100 years.

These hidden agenda include the potential consequences of crypto rules:

• Reduction in budget revenue: Cryptocurrency transactions reduce tax collection compared to traditional financial operations.
• Piece of monetary policy: Many of the dollar -backed assets issuance can complicate integrated monetary policy.
• Dangers of financial stability: A parallel financial system with various rules can introduce new systemic risks.
• Changes in political power: Federal Reserve reduction in independence and increased the influence of the Executive Branch on monetary policy.
• Economic uncertainty: The ability to reduce market fluctuations and forecasts during political transfer.

Analysts are asking whether Trump’s crypto ventures are designed to weaken the Federal Reserve Control? Legislation creates a framework where private companies can issue dollar -backed assets with potentially less surveillance than traditional banking entities.

The Trump administration has developed its cryptocurrency rules as a forward -looking reforms, designed to give the United States a position as a leader in digital finance. But under this story there is a complex political agenda. This legislation can reduce the influence of the Federal Reserve on monetary policy, introducing alternative currency such as tax treatment with favorable tax treatment, and can have the power to change key financial institutions.

Related: This trillion dollar industry is the place where you need to find your next investment-why is there

The full effect will be clear over time. The certainty is that its effects will go beyond the cryptocurrency markets, which has the ability to renew America’s fundamental elements of financial and political discipline. The central question is whether these changes will strengthen or weaken US economic stability and global leadership. In order to understand its implications, it is important to look at the dynamics of the power that changes the official statements of the past, which they hide – then we can decide whether reforms serve the good or tight political purposes of the people.