There is no “I” in the machine, but one is “us”.
From age, maybe since writing or art, humans have made written or verbal requests to make pictures of other human artists. And at any time in history, this person did not claim to be a person requesting the art that he was actually the artist.
At the same time there are so -called “AI” generative image technologies, and suddenly people who write “gestures” call themselves an artist. When I first encountered it, I couldn’t understand how anyone could think like this. It seems that this is the same process that was always. The person who writes the request is the artist’s client, and the artist now becomes a machine.
I am having an online debate about such things with people, and eventually these debates have revealed that many pointers think of themselves as “artists” because machines Only Do what they are told.
Basically, the machines have no “me” in their process, and therefore they have no saplush input. If you give a person a group of text, the work they will create will be based on their thinking, “How’s here I It will make drawings. But, according to the “AI” enthusiasts, without any “I”, the machines are producing a “pure” interpretation of a kind of promoter …