When I first wrote “Vector Databases: Shiny Object Syndrome and the Case of the Missing Unicorn“ In March 2024, the industry was reeling in hype. The vector database was positioned as The next big thing -The infrastructure layer is essential for the general AI era. Billions of venture dollars flowed in, developers rushed to embed in their pipelines and analysts tracked funding rounds with bated breath. Pineconefor , for , for , . weveatefor , for , for , . Chromafor , for , for , . Milos And a dozen others.
The promise was addictive: finally, a way to search with meaning instead of broken keywords. Just throw your enterprise knowledge into VectorStore, connect to LLM and watch the magic.
Except the magic is never fully created.
two years, Reality check Has arrived: 95% of organizations investing in general AI initiatives are seeing zero measurable returns. And, many of the caveats I’ve raised in that time — about the limitations of vectors, the crowded vendor landscape and the dangers of treating vector databases as silver bullets — have played out exactly as predicted.
Prophecy 1: The Lost Unicorn
At the time, I questioned whether Pinecone—the poster child of the category—would achieve unicorn status or become the “missing unicorn” of the database world. Today, that question has been answered in the most telling way: there is a pinecone Looking for sales by notificationstruggling to break through amid fierce competition and customer mania.
Yes, Pinecone raised large rounds and signed the marquee logo. But in practice, the distinction was thin. Open source players like Milos, Quadrant and Chroma undercut them on cost. Responsive like Postgres (with pgvector) and Elasticsearch added vector support as a feature only. And users quickly asked: “Why introduce a whole new database when my current stack already works well enough with vectors?”
Conclusion: Pinecone, once worth close to a billion dollars, is now looking for a home. A truly lost unicorn. In September 2025, Pannikon appointed Ash Ashutosh As CEO, founder Ed is moving into a chief scientist role with Liberty. Time is telling: The leadership change comes amid mounting pressure and questions over his long-term independence.
Prediction 2: Vectors alone won’t cut it
I also argued that vector databases by themselves were not a final solution. If your use case requires precision – looking for “error 221” in the LIC manual – a pure vector search will happily return “error 222” as “close enough”. Cute in demo, disastrous in production.
This tension between similarity and compatibility has proved as fatal to the myth of vector databases as all-purpose engines.
“Businesses discovered the hard way that semantic ≠correct.”
Developers who happily replaced lexical search for vectors quickly… combined with vectors… lexical search. Teams that expected vectors to “just work” ended up bolting on metadata filtering, Rerankers and manual rules. By 2025, the consensus is clear: vectors are powerful, but only as part of a hybrid stack.
Prediction 3: A crowded field becomes a commodity
The explosion of vector database startups was never sustainable. Vivit, Milos (via Zellis), Chroma, Vespa, Quadrant – each claimed to be fine discriminators, but for most buyers they all did the same thing: store vectors and retrieve nearest neighbors.
Today, very few of these players are breaking even. The market has fragmented, commoditized and in many ways been swallowed up by incumbents. Vector search is now a checkbox feature in cloud data platforms, not a standalone mutt.
As I wrote then: distinguishing one vector DB from another will be an increasing challenge. This challenge has only increased. Waldfor , for , for , . Marcofor , for , for , . Lanced bfor , for , for , . postgressqlfor , for , for , . SQL Hat Viewfor , for , for , . Oracle 23cfor , for , for , . Azure sqlfor , for , for , . Cassandrafor , for , for , . Radiusfor , for , for , . neo4jfor , for , for , . Single storefor , for , for , . elasticsearchfor , for , for , . Open Searchfor , for , for , . apahce solr… the list goes on.
The New Reality: Hybrids and Graphrog
But this isn’t just a story of decline—it’s a story of evolution. From the ashes of vector hype, new paradigms are emerging that combine multiple perspectives.
Hybrid Search: Keyword + Vector is now the default for serious applications. Companies learned that you need both precision and ambiguity, precision and vocabulary. Tools like Apache Solr, ElasticSearch, PGVector and Pinecone’s own “Cascading Retrieval” embrace this.
Graphog: In late 2024/2025 the most popular buzzard is Graphrag-Graph Enhanced Recovery Enhanced Generation. By marrying vectors with knowledge graphs, GraphRag encodes relationships between entities that are embedded alone. The payoff is dramatic.
Benchmarks and evidence
Amazon’s AI Blog From Benchmark Letariawhere hybrid GraphRag increased response accuracy from ~50% to 80%, with a plus in test datasets in finance, healthcare, industry, and law.
Graphrog Bench The benchmark (released May 2025) provides a rigorous evaluation of GraphRag vs. vanilla rig with increasing reasoning tasks, multi-hop queries, and domain challenges.
one An open review evaluation of Rag vs Graphrag Each approach has been found to have strengths depending on the task – but hybrid combinations often perform best.
Falkordb’s blog reports that when schema precision matters (structured domains), GraphRag can improve vector retrieval by a factor of 4 to 3.4x on certain criteria.
Graphrog’s rise underscores the larger point: recovery isn’t about any shiny objects. It’s about the building Recovery systems -Layered, hybrid, context-aware pipelines that deliver the right information at the right time, with the right health, to the LLM.
What does this mean going forward?
The verdict is in: Vector databases were never miracles. They were a step – a major one – in the evolution of search and retrieval. But they are not, and never were.
The winners in this space won’t be those who sell Vector as a standalone database. They will be the ones embedding vector search into the wider ecosystem – integrating graphs, metadata, rules and context engineering into integrated platforms.
In other words: Unicorn is not a vector database. A unicorn is a recovery stack.
Looking Ahead: What’s Next?
The Unified Data Platform will use Vector + Graph: Expect major DB and cloud vendors to offer integrated retrieval stacks (vector + graph + full text) as built-in capabilities.
“Recovery engineering” will emerge as a distinct discipline: As MLOps has matured, so will practice around embedding tuning, hybrid ranking and graph construction.
Metamodels are learning to ask better questions: The LMS of the future may learn Dynamically adjusting weights to orchestrate which retrieval method to use.
Secular and multimodal graphs: Already, researchers are extending graphograms to recognize time (T. Gregg) and multimedia integration (such as combining images, text, video).
Open benchmarks and abstraction layers: Love the tools Benchmark Cad .
From shiny objects to essential infrastructure
The arc of the Vector Database story has followed a classic path: a massive hype cycle, followed by introspection, refinement, and maturity. In 2025, vector search is no longer the shiny object that everyone blindly pursues—it’s now a key building block within a more sophisticated, multi-dimensional retrieval architecture.
The original warnings were fine. Pure vector-based expectations often fall on a couple of health-related, relative complexity and enterprise constraints. Yet this technology was never discarded: it forced the industry to recover, blending semantic, lexical and relational strategies.
If I were to write a sequel in 2027, I suspect it would develop the vector database not as a unicorn, but as a legacy infrastructure—basic, but with clever orchestration layers, adaptive retrieval controllers, and AI systems that dynamically select. which one The retrieval tool fits the query.
So far, the real battle isn’t vectors vs. keywords — it’s the degradation, blending, and discipline in building retrieval pipelines that reliably ground general AI in facts and domain knowledge. This is the unicorn we should be chasing now.
Amit Verma heads the engineering and AI labs Neuron 7.
Read more from us Guest authors. Or, consider submitting a post of your own! See our Guidelines here.