Photo by author
# Introduction
You know what no one tells you about data science? The interesting part – modeling, algorithms, achieving impressive metrics – probably accounts for 20% of a successful project. The other 80% is decidedly boring: arguing about what success means, staring at data distributions, and constructing initial baselines. But that 80% is what separates projects that stay on board from projects that stay in one Jupyter A notebook somewhere.
This guide goes through the structure that works in different domains and problem types. It’s not about specific tools or algorithms. It’s about the process that helps you avoid common traps: building for the wrong purpose, missing data quality issues that surface in production, or optimizing metrics that don’t matter to the business.
We will cover five steps that form the basis of solid data science work.
- Defining the problem clearly.
- Understanding your data well.
- Establishing objective baselines.
- Making systematic improvements.
- Validation against real-world conditions.
Let’s begin.
# Step 1: First, define the problem in technical terms in business terms
Start with the actual decision that needs to be made. Not a “customer churn forecast,” but something more concrete: “Identify which customers to target with our retention campaign in the next 30 days, given that we can only contact 500 people and each contact costs $15.”
This framing immediately explains the following:
- What you are optimizing for (return on maintenance costs (ROI), not model accuracy).
- What constraints matter (time, budget, communication limitations).
- What does success look like (campaign vs model metrics)
Write it in one paragraph. If you struggle to articulate it, it’s a sign that you don’t fully understand the problem yet. Show it to the stakeholders who requested the work. If they respond with three paragraphs of explanation, you definitely don’t get it. This back and forth is normal. Learn and improve iteratively rather than incrementally.
Only after this alignment should you translate the business problem into technical requirements: forecasting target, time horizon, acceptable latency, desired precision vs. recall trade-offs, etc.
# Step 2: Get your hands dirty with data
Don’t think about deciding on your end-to-end data pipeline just yet. Don’t think about configuring your machine learning operations (MLOPS) infrastructure. Don’t even think about which model to use. Open a Jupiter notebook and load a sample of your data: enough to be representative, but small enough to iterate quickly.
Spend real time here. You’re looking for a number of things when searching for data:
Data quality issues: Missing values, duplicates, encoding errors, time zone problems, and data entry typos. Every dataset has this. Finding them now saves you from having to debug mysterious model behavior three weeks from now.
Distribution characteristics: Analyze and try to answer the following questions: Are your characteristics normally distributed? Heavy skid? Bimodal? What is the range of your target variable? Where are the outliers, and are they errors or legitimate edge cases?
Secular patterns: If you have timestamps, plot everything over time. Look for seasonality, trends, and sudden shifts in data collection methods. If you ignore them, these patterns will either inform your features or break your model in production.
Relationship with the target: What features are you actually trying to predict? Not in a model yet, just in raw correlations and crosstabs. If nothing shows a relationship, that’s a red flag that you may not have a clue in the data.
Class imbalance: If you are predicting something rare. A model that achieves 99% accuracy may sound impressive until you realize that the base rate is 99.5%. All data science projects have context differences.
Keep a running document of everything you analyze and observe. “In March 2023, “user IDs changed form” or “purchases in Europe are in euros, not dollars” or “20% of sign-up dates are missing, from mobile app users,” such notes. This document later becomes part of your data validation checklist and will help you write better data quality checks.
# Step 3: Create the simplest possible baseline
Before you reach for the XG Boost, other add-on models, or whatever’s trending lately, build something simple, yet simple.
- For classification, start by predicting the most common class.
- For regression, predict the mean or median.
- For a time series, predict the last observed value.
Measure its performance with the same metrics you’ll use later for your improved model. This is your baseline. Any model that doesn’t beat it isn’t increasing the price, period.
Then Create a simple heuristic based on your Step 2 finding. Let’s say you’re forecasting customer churn and you notice that customers who log in for 30 days rarely return. Make this your heuristic: “If no login in 30 days, predict drug.” It’s crude, but it’s informed by actual patterns in your data.
Next, create a simple model: logistic regression for classification, linear regression for regression. Use anywhere between 5 and 10 of your most exciting traits from step 2. The basic feature engineering is fine (log transforms, a hot encoding) but nothing exotic yet.
Now you have three basic lines of sharpening. Here’s something interesting: the linear model ends up in production more often than most people admit. It is interpretable, debuggable and fast. If it gets you 80% of the way to your goal, stakeholders often prefer it to a complicated model that gets you more than 85% but no one can explain when it fails.
# Step 4: Iterate on features, not models
This is where many data professionals take a wrong turn. They share the same features and trade-offs between random forest, XG Boost, LightGBM, neural networks, and ensemble ensembles. They spend hours tuning hyperparameters for marginal gains.
A better way is: Keep a simple model (the baseline model from step 3, or one level of complexity) and iterate over the features instead..
Domain related properties: Talk to people who understand the domain. They’ll share insights you’ll never find in statistics. “Orders placed between 2-4 AM are almost always fraudulent” or “Customers who call support in their first week have a very high lifetime value.” These observations become characteristics.
TERMS OF DISCUSSION: Revenue per visit, clicks per session, transactions per customer. Ratios and rates often carry more signal than raw counts because they capture relationships between variables.
Worldly characteristics: Average, averaged over different windows, and rate of change in behavior since last purchase. If your problem has a time component, these properties are usually of little importance.
Accumulation: Group level statistics. Average purchase amount for this user’s zip code. Typical order size for this product category. These features encode population-level patterns that may miss individual-level features.
Tests are conducted one at a time or in small groups.
- Did performance improve meaningfully? keep it
- Has it stayed the same or gotten worse? Leave it alone.
This procedural approach consistently throws several features at a model and hopes that something sticks. Only after you finish feature engineering should you consider more complex models. Often, you’ll find that you don’t need to.
# Step 5: Validate against the data you’ll see in production, not just the holdout set
Your validation strategy needs to mirror production conditions as closely as possible. If your model will make predictions on data from January 2026, do not validate on randomly sampled data from 2024-2025. Instead, validate only the December 2025 data, using models specifically trained on data during November 2025.
Time-based distribution is important for almost every real-world problem. The data flow is real. Patterns change. Changes in customer behavior. A model that works beautifully on randomly shuffled data often stumbles in production because it was validated on the wrong distribution.
Beyond temporary validation, stress testing against realistic scenarios. Here are some examples:
Missing data: In training, you can have 95% of the features populated. In production, 30% of API calls may time out or fail. Does your model still work? Can it even predict?
A change in distribution: Your training data may have 10% class imbalance. Last month, it moved up to 15 percent due to seasonal or market changes. How does performance change? Is it still acceptable?
Delay requirements: Your model needs to return predictions in less than 100ms to be useful. Does it meet this threshold? Every single time? What about peak load when you are handling 10x the normal traffic?
Edge matters: What happens to brand new users with no history? Products that have just been launched? Users from countries represented in your training data? These are not hypotheticals. Those are situations you will encounter in production. Be sure to handle edge cases.
Create a monitoring dashboard before deploying. Not only the accuracy of the model but also the characteristic distribution of the inputs, the distribution of the predictors, and how well the predictions correspond to the actual results. Before it becomes a crisis, you need to catch up again.
# The result
As you can see, these five steps are not revolutionary. They are Almost boring In their straightforward simplicity. That’s exactly the point. Data science projects fail when developers skip the boring parts because they’re eager to get to the “interesting” work..
You don’t need complex techniques for most problems. You need to understand what you’re solving, know your data intimately, create something simple that works, improve it through systematic iteration, and validate it against the messy reality of production.
That’s the job. It’s not always exciting, but it’s what gets projects across the finish line. Happy learning and building!
Bala Priya c is a developer and technical writer from India. She loves working at the intersection of mathematics, programming, data science, and content creation. His areas of interest and expertise include devops, data science, and natural language processing. She enjoys reading, writing, coding and coffee! Currently, she is working on learning and sharing her knowledge with the developer community by authoring tutorials, how-to guides, opinion pieces and more. Bala also engages resource reviews and coding lessons.