A Garman Venu 3 vs. OnePlus Watch 3 comparison

Garman has long been my going smart watch for fitness tracking, especially Garaman Venu 3, which offers excellent exercise tracking and amazing battery life. But this year, One Plus Watch 3 attracted my attention. Even with a better battery performance and a latest tool cut, this is the first dress OS Smart Watch that removed me from the Garman. So, I went out to test the two unexpected rivals, which is a better fitness watch, and the results surprised me a little.

Starting with their standout specs, both Vano 3 and One Plus provide both amazing battery life. Garman Venu offers for up to 14 days between 3 charges and 26 days of easy battery saver mode. In my test, the clock continued with heavy use for about 4 days (including daily GPS exercise) – as a state that has separated the Garaman from the field for some time.

The OnePlus Watch offers 16 days in power -saving mode and about 5 days in smart mode, which is noteworthy for the wear OS device. During my review, I was able to eliminate the heavy use of about 3 days before I needed to charge. One Plus achieved an impressive achievement with dual chip architecture that improves electricity consumption. Although Venu 3 eliminates the still wearing OS device, the latter gives me almost comparable experience of the battery, while also operating powerful smart watch apps.

Although a minor detail, both watches use the proprietary charger and not support wireless charging for a much easier experience. I am anxious for the day when all my wear can generate electricity on the same charging pad.

When it comes to fitness tracking, Garman is a powerhouse, confession, a powerhouse. Garman’s training tools and analysis are unparalleled. Nevertheless, while the OnePlus Watch is not filled with 3 features, it offers enough fitness tracking for most consumers. It also supports more than 110 exercise varieties. Like Veno 3, it is also proud of the welfare scores such as ECG support and other health monitoring tools.

In short, the difference between these two devices is shrinking. Thanks to its sustainable strength and the latest fitness tools, the latest One Plus Watch offers a very basic experience to Vano 3 for casual users.

The OnePlus Watch 3 really shines with its wear OS platform, which offers a more comprehensive smart watch experience than Garman Venu 3. I like the Google Play Store Garman provides a very wide selection of apps than the limited offerings, and you also get a full suit of integrated Google Apps. I personally use a hearing app on my smart watch on a daily basis. When the indoor bull mid -book sounds, I use Google Home to check my camera and see if I need to stop my walking treadmill to answer the door. On multiple occasions, my partner is then text and asked to bring the package provided by him.

In other words, I do a lot from my wrist with my smart watch. On the contrary, Garman’s software is very fitting. It introduces some smart features, but it is not equal to the ability or variety that provides OS.

Although OnePlus is above 3 in its broader functionality, when it comes to high fitness tools, the Garman is the king. Although technically offers a smart watch, Venu 3 athletes, including advanced heart rate sensors and GPS tracking.

During my review period, everyone proved to be extremely reliable. The aforementioned heart rate graph has represented one of these few times to maintain my dedicated chest strap, and even, even still, the figures are within 5 heartburn. On the other hand, the OnePlus Watch 3 struggles to record the accurate heart rate, especially during interval work as shown in the graph. When I promote my workout, you can see where the clock is far against my chest strap. For me, One Plus is quietly concrete of tracking, but not for detailed training analysis.

The Garman Connect app also offers an extraordinary detailed experience, which gives me all the data I need to track my performance and recovery. The OnePlus Watch 3 has definitely improved its tracking capabilities, but it still cannot cope with the depth or accuracy of the Garman. Most importantly, I can’t be personalized on the extent to which I do the screen data fields on my Garman Watch. This appointment helps me keep tabs on stats that I mostly care about about middle exercises, instead of waiting for what I can do with a limited app experience.

As far as a broader image is analyzed, body batteries like Garman’s training tools work a lot for me. One Plus is moving in this direction, but nevertheless, the training analysis is not as proud of the same kind as the Garman. Recently. For serious athletes, Veno 3 is a better choice, thanks to its extensive fitness features. Garman’s latest tools such as physical batteries, recovery time, and Garman coach separated it.

Aesthetically, OnePlus Watch 3 feels like a premium device, thanks to its traditional design and now the functional rotating crown. Although I am not particularly fond of the case, its overall beauty is undeniable. I also appreciate a large 1.5 -inch display, which makes it happy to communicate with apps and read messages. On the other hand, the Venu is 3 springs, though it still manages to be advanced. It also comes in two cases to fit the wide range of wrists. Personally, especially during exercise, I found the Veno 3s unconditional and comfortable.

Recently. , Battery life is no longer a deciding factor between these two watches. Both devices offer excellent performance. For people who prefer to track detailed fitness and require a strong health partner, Garman Veno 3 has been a better choice. However, with a well -mixed battery life in addition to the OnePlus Watch 3, its fitness and smart features, the average is a very attractive alternative to the average user, and I am surprisingly find myself more attractive to my personal use and my recommendations for regular fitness fans.