The conversation around the AI in art does not need to be introduced. While developing from YouTube videos to YouTube channels, isolated from Reddit Threads to Reddate Communities, the Internet has made it clear that one of the great questions after the post is: “Is AI Art Real Art”?
Indeed, for everyone who is familiar with any conversation, the question is basically a source. It depends on the definition of one’s art and artist, and sometimes it seems absolutely meaningless to discuss anything, except which of the two current framework is most accurate. However, I am convinced that these two framework lose an important insight into the nature of art and artists, and I believe that understanding of this insight is invaluable to achieve any consensus on this topic. Earlier, however, I should (briefly) outline the two current global ideas that highlight the parties to our debate.
Sides of the discussion
The first is a process. It can be summarized as the idea that what is valuable about art is the amount of efforts made in it, that what is needed from a piece of art is the knowledge that someone has done the real hours of his limited life just to prepare what we are now seeing in front of us. The fact is that only many people in the world can paint in a particular way, make it unique, and make it valuable because it is unique. Supporters of this theory realize fraud when they are informed that they had enjoyed something. He believed that this image of his favorite character, or to reflect his struggle he was related to, was created by a man who cared about it enough to spend hours or years to make it. When they are told that the vision of a kind spirit is a lie, they are not happy.
The other side of the argument is a supporter of the concept of art as a product. This approach prefers to value something, rather than focusing on the way to get there. If I see something that makes me happy, then happiness is just as real, even if not the source of what has made me realize it. If anything, the fact that no one had to work in the bone to enjoy my stupid pictures, of course; , This is an honor. Reducing enrollment for creativity can only lead to more creativity in the world, causing only the higher amount of things we like. This is the promise of AI, which makes it magical. What if you have everything, and can’t give anything for it?
Both ideas have their qualities. When we experience something, the emotions we feel are appreciated, regardless of the source. Similarly, some of these emotions are often linked to our impressions about the artist, and should not be exempted. There are more nuances on both sides, and I have rarely done justice to them. Nor will I try to do that here. The other parts of the debate are often disconnected more than one another, with the AI slopes and artist elite talk about, which apparently squeeze the waters without any purpose. But there is a comprehensive way to explain this confusion. In my view, I should conclude that this conversation must eventually be presented, this is as follows: Art is not just a process or product, but a language.
Art and communications
As a method of communication, the concept of art is far from the novel, but when it comes to our modern context, it has unexpected implications. To understand this, we should generally consider the nature of communication, after which the nature of artistic communication is encountered, before we can finally understand how the AI fits the picture.
Language and dialogue is a title that is worthy of study. For our purposes, we will start with the theory RevolutionWhich we get from a French philosopher Jacks Dairda (Between others). This theory posts that all meanings are delayed, that things always mean something else, and that means “No meaning is complete and tomorrow is not ”. The word “chair” may not possibly surround everything that we can consider in your mind or a chair in my mind, nor can it know everything about the nature of chairs, their history, their nuclear makeup, etc. This is just a useful summary that allows us to interact with the world without wasting details.
It applies to the individual level as well as cultural. If I tell you that I love cats, your understanding of this word will never be similar to me, even if we have spent every moment since birth. What kind of cats, what size, what color? We want to use more words to use more. Of course, this is true for the playful things in the most personal corners of our minds. Our beliefs, our emotions, the stories we tell ourselves about the world. These things cannot be conveyed with any kind of words, not really. But maybe we can approach some symbols of this communication by making art about it.
Art, of course, is not a completely visual source. It can be an image, song, a collection of words, or a collection of the above mentioned. However, what makes it special is not a combination of things we see in our social media feeds, but the place that exists among them. If I tell you that I was anxious, you don’t really understand me. But if I tell you that I have not been able to sleep for more than a few hours for several nights, my nails are tied to the signs of cutting, that my stomach is full of fear if I let my mind wander around for a moment – then you may start understanding what I have said.
This happens because by not fully describing the thing I usually indicate what I am talking about, I am preventing your mind from using a short hand that you are already aware of this will be described without realizing my situation. Instead, I am forcing you to work for this understanding of this understanding, and if I have set the stage properly, the understanding you get to fill the understanding that you have left with your words will get more truth than my experience. This is a magical process that we often describe as art. The process of explaining the meaning in something other than the most direct style, thus speaks more than the artist’s intention.
I should note here that when I am now using emotional examples, I am not sure art needs any kind of message. The same principles apply to all the things we can consider. The painting of a beautiful lake, or the street image of a city, works through the same method of attracting something through the same procedure to fully describe your attention. I can’t tell you about the lake. I should show you a distortion of it, and you come to see the lake as I did by understanding incomplete reproduction. I just can’t tell you that the street is busy with people of all walks of life. I should show you the whole picture, and you should allow you to discover the truth for yourself as you observe all the details of my picture and add them together.
This is the “soul” that anti -supporters often talk about. In my opinion, this is a properly ambiguous word for a quite confusing thing. The aspect of that is the most important to us, that is what I said earlier in a couple of couple’s paragraph – “If I have set the stage properly”. It does not matter, the skill requires skills to create a meaningful thing, and high degree control is needed on every aspect of the final results.
Control here is very important. It is already difficult to say something that has no simple words. If our control over our work is limited, it becomes impossible. In fact, we do not have to look at the AI to see how it affects the art. We just need to consider things created by groups of people organized in different ways.
As an example, consider a humble film. Although we often consider the art of some films, we often talk about a film as a number of art works. We talk about the performance of a particular actor, or praise the film’s dialogue writing. When we talk about the film overall, we often attribute it to the director. Whatever part we look at, the artist is the person who has the control and creative freedom to decide how this section is presented to the viewer. Similarly, we often talk about the “soul” films produced by big corporations, in films where the final product of artists was somehow limited by external factors. This, we often agree, kill the film’s “spirit”.
The implications of AI art
After considering the above, AI’s compatibility is clear. The nature of “preparing” content through algorithmic analysis and the synthesis of millions of existing tasks goes away from the artist. If I ask for a cat picture from the midwest, I do not control what the current pictures of cats were used to make my masterpiece. It doesn’t matter how many words I use, it does not matter that my quick structure does not matter, the final result will be important aspects that I do not have the option to make a decision. Ai’s a lot of promise he is Athletes My imagination needs work to turn into reality, which essentially shows me less control over how this fact is conveyed.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that many production of the AI model is in the hands of a lot of renons. Many tools and excellent methods are being developed to improve this control, and one can argue that they represent the steps to make AI art more “real” in the form of art. However, these steps are necessary to keep in mind the above. That a fundamental feature of art is the ability to convey things directly without saying, Both artists and observer need to work For this feature to really shine.
Personally, I understand that trying to truly use these mathematical wonders to make some meaningful Lia We should focus on more modular methods of “use all the art of the world” to “use all the art of the world” and instead of focusing on more modular methods of encoding and regenerating meaningful things. Perhaps a small artist community can create a set of algorithm that encodes the unique style of working, and can connect them to more complex patterns that produce spiritual art, which we have seen earlier. Perhaps an artist programmer may write the code to re -create his childhood images in his nurturing vision, and present it better than any painting or story. I, The focus will be to give the artist more control over every part of the process. The possibilities are endless, but I don’t think we can advance the boundaries of artistic effort by telling Chat GPT to prepare women dressed by a chat jeep. Do you