During the post -Picasso exhibition in Milan, I came after A famous informational arish How was the art historian Alfred Bar, how was it developed by artistic traditions before modernist movements such as Cubism? Picasso is often kept as one of the original and influential figures of modern art, but the bar chart made many artists simple, which he pulled from, El Greco, Casin, African sculptors. It was surprising to me: If a generative AI model was fed to all these inputs, would it create cubesism? Could it create the next great artistic “progress”?
These experiments – spread to three cities and focus on three famous artists. I recently talked to Daniel Ek recently, about how much copyright rules are bound in music. Songs and lyrics enjoy long protection than many pharmaceutical patents. The most important edge of this debate is sitting on the edge, and it observed that the Generato AI already created an amazing range of music. Some of it is good. Most of it is terrible. But almost all of them borrow from all current work patterns and structures.
The musicians are already prosecuted each other for borrowing from previous works. How will this law be in accordance with a form of artity that is driven by indicators and ideas, which is fully built on the carpus of the current substance?
And the questions do not stop there. Who, of course, owns the results of the generative model? The user who developed the gesture? The manufacturer who created the model? Artists whose tasks were prepared to train? Will the social forces that stand artistic – criticism, curators, flavors, will still control it? Or will there be a new, era -era ranking? If every artist is always borrowed from others, is AI’s productive recovery really different? And in such a legal culture, how long can the copyright law maintain its current form? The US right is in the office of the post Began to deal with ownership thorny problems And says that if productive results can be copied if he is a large human author. But it is playing a ketchup in the fast -growing field.
Different industries are responding in different ways. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Recently announced The use of the products of the film will not disqualify them from the Oscar dispute – and when they use technology, they will not need to be disclosed. Many famous films including Oscar winner BrutalAI included in their productive process.
Meanwhile, the world of music is continuing the boat with praise of its origin. Consider the recent case against Ed Sheeran. In 2016, he was prosecuted against the heirs of Marvin Gie’s “Late Eight On -On” co -author, Ed Town, who claimed that Sheeran’s “loud voice” had copied the earlier song, harmony and rhythm. When the case was finally tried in 2023, Sheeran brought the guitar to the stand. He made the controversial Four Rag development-I-III-IV-VV and made together A mesh -up The songs made on the same foundation. The point was clear: These are the basic units of writing songs. After a brief consideration, the jury Sheeran was not found responsible.
After the trial, reflect Sheeran’s Said: “These chords are ordinary building blocks … nobody has their own or the way they are playing, so no one owns a blue blue.”