When spiritual rituals are manufactured by machines, what is sacred?
You are sitting in a quiet moment before sleep, looking for comfort after a difficult day. You open an app and type: “I’m struggling with grief.” Within seconds, a soft voice responds with prayer according to your pain, with regard to verses that speak directly to your heart. Words bring peace. Later, you find that the prayer was developed by AI, the verses selected by the algorithm, the relief provided by the code. Does it make any difference?
I scored on my phone at 2am after my grandmother’s last rites, I first faced this question. I downloaded the grief app offered me “personal meditation for loss” – and honestly? He helped. The sound was hot, the words were only selected for me. Just later I realized that I was comforted through a code. I felt grateful – and somehow cheated. This is a strange thing, thanks to the algorithm.
It is no longer a hypothetical concept. In beliefs and continents, artificial intelligence is quietly entering our most sacred places, as the morning fog is wandering in the cathedral. Religious AI apps serve millions of people around the world, churches experience with AI influx sermons, and people describe the feeling of “understanding” the faster feeling through algorithmic spiritual advisers. Sometimes they prefer them to human priests. The appeal is clear: Ai does not decide, never seems tired, and when he does not wait for the morning hours, it is comfortable at 3 o’clock in the morning.
Explosive growth shows in numbers, but the more amazing story is in human reaction – dirty, contradictory, deeply personal. Early adopters get real relief in AI spiritual guidance, yet when we test what is happening in reality, some complex emerges. When a Muslim app develops personal prayers based on the search date, “Divine Time” is actually algorithmic timing – to detect and respond to the machine learning behavior patterns. This is easily accurate. And that’s exactly what bothers me.
Should we prepare tools that change about when to pray? I’m not sure
AI religious content is attracted to an authentic tradition but is primarily derived – like a brilliant student who reads everything but was actually nothing. Rabbi Sarah Chen, who studied the digital religion communities, caught the tension: “People are gaining real comfort in the guided prayer. But I wonder if they are looking for God, or just looking for their spiritual hunger?” The question is hanging like incense, sweet and slightly asthma in the air.
The real religious parties are fruitful. These include the person who always discusses the Bible study, sermons that you get into uncomfortable identity, and amazing moments when ancient wisdom talks about unexpectedly modern life. You know – human things. AI religious experiences, on the contrary, are attracted to correction, the maximum supply of what you have indicated, reinforcing existing beliefs, smooth the friction that is often characterized by authentic spiritual development.
We are creating a spiritual echo chamber that feels deeply personal but in reality a deep prediction can be made. Dr. Michael Taurus strictly said: ” It is like having a physician who has ever recorded each session – technically inspiring, spiritually objectionable.
This raises uncomfortable questions about the role of challenge in spiritual life. Most religious traditions emphasize that development occurs by boat with difficult questions, not through algorithmic affirmation. Jacob fought the boat with the angel, not AI assistant. (Although I think both of you can leave you a sense of changing and slightly injury.)
Perhaps the deepest question is not whether the AI can provide spiritual relief – clearly – but whether it can provide spiritual change. There is a difference, though it is easier to feel more than explained. The comfort may be algorithm: AI systems learn that some verses of anxiety or specific techniques calm certain nerve samples. They provide this relief to perfect time and personal health, such as a spiritual vending machine that never comes out of your favorite blessing.
But change? It often comes from irreparable mystery of unexpected sources, amazing competitions, something other than yourself. Can any algorithm provide the other when it is primarily a mirror of human intelligence, which reflects our patterns that return to us in our sophisticated arrangements?
I am writing this when the Thunder rolls out of my window – somehow, the divine questions about the questions. Fitting. Many religious traditions emphasize that spiritual exercise requires, presence, presence, such as attention that creates meaning through engagement. When AI automate the generation of prayer, corrects our religious content, guides our meditation, what is the work of changing these things? Do we lose the spiritual equality of muscle memory?
Actually, no – it’s not completely fair. Rejecting AI’s religious role is completely deprived of something important: for people isolated from traditional communities through geography, disability, or social conditions, these tools provide real connection with practice and tradition. My neighbor, a domestic bound with chronic illness, describes his prayer app as “the life of the Holy Life”. Who am I to ask him?
The sacred may not be protected from machines, but what we are discovered cannot be copied by them. In our rush towards spiritual reform, we are at risk of losing the real community’s productivity, the surprise of facing the divine mystery, and the labor of change of authentic exercise. The real challenge is not determining whether the Chatboat prayer is “counting” – it is aware of the difference between the spirit and the change between spiritual recommendation and spiritual revelation.
So it is probably not about whether AI’s prayer is authentic. Perhaps it is about whether we can still recognize that when we face it, we feel like authenticity. In the era of artificial everything, awakening from this difference can be the most sacred process. Even though I can be wrong. Ask me again the next month – I may have a completely different answer.
What role do you think AI should play in the spiritual life? Have you faced AI in religious context, and how did it change you – or didn’t you?
If this research resonates (or bothers you), I would love to hear about it. For more of my exams, follow me how artificial intelligence is new to our most human experiences – abusive, beautifully, from the problem.
The writer’s note As a non-local English speaker, I use AI tools-like Chat GPT-support for clear and grammar support. Although these tools help express it, each post reflects my own thoughts, questions and living experiences. The reflection is prepared with the help of AI tools.
This post is part of the weekly series, “AI in real life: culture, power, and human future.”
Each week, I publish five themes articles:
est The deep dubious toe -Depth of AI’s effects on Systems and Systems
· AI Frontiers Tuesday-Tuesday with the reality world-renowned academic results
est Culture Watch Wednesday – Observations on the role of AI in art, media and meaning
est Take Quick on Thursday – fast, timely comment AI and on public life
est Reflection Friday – AI and personal insights on human condition
Browse past entries or subscribe to the full series here → https://articles.jmbonthous.com/
JM is the author of Bonnos The shock of AI culture And six other books about the human aspect of AI. He writes about how technology is renewing identity, culture and everyday life. View its latest books:
Contact us on the medium and follow the latest stories about the humanitarian aspect of AI to stay in the loop @jmbonthous1. Let’s help shape the human aspect of AI together!