Both of these apps finally fixed my creative workflow

For years, from the invoice to the movie watch listings, I have to go to the idea to manage everything. As a database, its flexibility is not similar, but when it comes to creative workflows, such as automatically writing ideas, collecting ideas, and collecting visual inspiration, the concept begins to feel a bit tight. I needed something that did not ask me to enter every passing idea in a system that he had shown. It is not how the creative flow works. At least not for me.

I know, I know. It is the usual answer here with the non -eliminating custom and famous graph view. But I wanted the Cloud First. So I started searching for a device that could fulfill it, if it was not in place, what would happen to the idea already. The same way I found myself a bounce between thoughts and Honor For a better part of one year. Most people are trying to organize their digital life, I started with one, tampered with the other, then went back and forth until I realized anything easy: both of these tools are not competing. They are completing each other. Why is it here to create a system that uses both apps do so well for me.

The trick, as usual, was not raising aside on the occasion of going. It was knowing what every tool is actually good – and then stay out of their way. The feeling changed that I approached both tools. For example, I stopped using the concept as a place for non -structured notes. Not because it can’t, but because it never felt natural. Certainly, you can create endless pages and all pages. You can embed anything in your own custom. But that multi -page ranking is rapidly out of control. I was using the concept for a list of interesting places in these cities I wanted to visit, and over time, this structure became a maze – more than one layers deep, difficult to visit, and difficult to maintain.

When the structure and purpose are, the idea grows. This is the place where I develop a system that is automatic in the process. When there is no one, the skills work best. This is the place where I think. The moment I stopped trying to force an app to do all this, things clicked, and I could move between them without rubbing, and let each tool handle it instead of bending into something.

This is not just a user interface problem. This is a mentality problem. The idea you set up tables, databases and more when you decide to enter some data. It makes me feel like every idea needs a home before it exists. The pressure to manage very quickly kills my creative flow and prevents how much I use. I may have thoughts, but the environment does not feel good. You will not want to work in Google Sheets. The only effect of conceptuality has the same effect.

The capabilities are dynamic. You don’t start with a table or template – you start with something. Notes, photos, bookmarks, and files are all easily organized and stored together with backlinks. It is close to how OCDI works and feels more like a live network than a tough notebook. That a shift changes everything. I don’t care where a thought is. I just occupy it, leave some tags, and move on. I will clean it later. Or not

When I am in a creative mode, I am doing anything from writing to an outline of something vague, so I have the ability to go. If I am collecting screenshots, reference visuals, I am preparing the notes or setting prices in numerous articles, it all goes there, easily referred to by qualification on the graph view. I can write half thought, leave it for a week, and already come back to connect it to three other ideas that I forgot. This is not just a good design. This is speed. And it is important that I be allowed to jump back to work and almost immediately remain in the creative place.

Good. In danger of sound, capabilities offer an environment that invites research. This includes how to treat capabilities that can be linked to these lines, fully, or objects that allow you to effectively convert it to a gallery, not just a document. It looks like a small thing, but when you are spending hours to sketch or snatch visual references together, it increases. You’re not just writing. You are effectively creating an integrated web of ideas. Apple offers experience, the wild tools, the closest, but not exactly the same, but not exactly the same. On the other hand, the concept does not work like this. This is a structure. Sometimes sometimes a little too precise. But that’s why it does so well for everything.

The abilities to think may improve, but the idea still goes on daily. This is the place where I track invoices, update my reading list, monitor freelance projects, and check repeated tasks. When I know what I’m tracking – things like client supply, brand campaigns, editorial piety – the idea is unbeaten. I can create a database with feedback and filters, connect them with automation, and set reminders that help in reality. This is the purpose for such work.

In contrast to abilities, the concept offers a kind of safety in knowing that everything has a place. If I log in today, I know exactly where to find it three weeks later. It also makes it incredibly easy to add data on the go. When I want to add something immediately, say, a new restaurant I have seen on Instagram, I use a concept form to log direct key details to my food database. Name, location, food, tag, and just. This form has been stored on my phone’s homepage as a bookmark and allows me to do this in seconds. This is the idea of ​​this type of friction.

I have tried to do it inside her abilities, and when a table view is present, it still feels like thinking. It is not really designed to register structural data, nor is it great to make a sense of large amounts of data.

The biggest mistake is thinking that these two tools are solving the same problem. They are not. They both allow you to write, collect, embed, and organize. But what they do with these abilities is completely different. The abilities are designed to find creativity and knowledge. Like Osidian, everything in its interface is leaning to connect the ideas through backlinks, nasted objects, graph views. It is less than a productive capacity tool and more than a creative studio. When I am not sure what I am working on, but I know I want to chase an idea, the abilities provide me with rooms to do so.

On the other hand, the idea is like a traditional work device. It doesn’t ask you to discover. It tells you to decide, to explain and to commit. And it makes a difference because how we feel when using these tools often commands whether we use them at all. Although it is certainly possible to use one of these tools exclusively, it seems like a work -based point of view of the types of data. In fact, I have tried to think many times, but every time I felt that I was using it because my notes were dirty or incomplete. But this was not a concept problem. It was a match. Once I gave her the role of her abilities instead, the concept stopped feeling like a burden and began to re -use.

Techway

There is no straight winner here. The abilities once again helped me get relief from the dirty workflow. It gave me the ability to think in pieces and collect ideas without committing. It is a means of planning and is still accustomed to the idea of ​​knowledge management for consumers. In fact, I would say that this is the first PKM tool for the user for the first time.

On the other hand, the idea helps me out of chaos. This is the device I trust that once I know what they are, to hold the pieces together. Pitch, invoices, things to check, restaurants are a big database, the concept is great for such workflows. He said, “At the end of the day, the two tolls taught me to stop searching for the perfect app and start building a better workflow instead.” For me, it was a set of abilities and ideas.