A series of photography in which it has been discovered on how discomfort, suspicion and visual wrong direction can accelerate our awareness – especially in the perfect, fabricated pictures.
The authenticity of fake deep is not merely abstract photography, but an irony study of visual trust – especially today, when the images produced by artificial intelligence and deep fax are rapidly separated from reality. It does not deepen – it makes it a step. And it arises the question: Does the syllable convince? Can a fiction be more sincere than photography documents as photography?
At first glance, the images are highly visible – as if taken underwater. One is ready to enter them. But the depth is fabricated. This does not have optical illusion or digital effect. It is made through the movement: hand gesture, camera movement. This is: The documentary film cans is not broken – the icon is caught directly from the camera with minimum adjustment.
Viewers think they think what they see – but the image lacks attention, center and objection. The familiar visual logic drops, and it is especially in the disruption that focuses on: not because the picture explains anything, but because it is against understanding. This deliberate misconduct is a part of this concept: the image does not maintain the eyes but examines whether the viewer is ready to stay inside the pause – or if it is easier to go to something more understandable.
At this interval, the uncertainty of the cognition emerges and more carefully, becomes an internal point of view. These are images that refuse to immediately understand. If the audience allows himself to be in this uncertainty, they themselves begin to feel the subtle shifts, shadows, shapes and structures of the illusion.
The first empty that is shown begins to work as a level of impression. The impairment of the impression becomes a change in the habit of eliminating its habit and a new understanding of the doorstep. This is not an aggression, but a deliberate pause in which one shows his own visual flexibility, as well as understanding that the way to overcome the sovereignty of the impression.
The authenticity of fake deep functions as uncomfortable photography. There is no screams, no drama – but gestures, silence, confusion, and confidence are interrupted. This is not visual discomfort – it’s a discomfort of confidence.
That is what it means. The fictitious depth stimulates the real impression – and in that regard, yes, it can be more sincere than a “purpose” document that is merely visible. The ability to engage with uncomfortable photography is closely connected to the cultivation of visual awareness – the ability to stop, to doubt, to look closely. Especially now, as the images are smooth, more convincing and absolutely fabricated.
