A Federal District Court judge found that Apple had deliberately violated the court order in the Apple Anti -Trust case vs. Apple Games.
“There is no fee on the web transaction,” Tim Swini, the CEO of Epic Games, tweeted about the court’s victory.
If Swinn is correct in translating the decision, it may be a profitable result for epic sports, which Apple has largely banned in the United States because of legal superstitions in the United States.
In a statement, the Apple spokesman said, “We strictly disagree with the decision. We will comply with the court order and we will appeal.”
“Apple’s 15 to 30 % of the junk fees are now as dead here as they are in Europe under the Digital Markets Act in the United States,” he said.
US District Court Judge Yun Gonzales Rogers insulted Apple’s previous judicial decision. He wrote, “For those reasons what has been presented here, the court deliberately violated the court.
2021 The decree that has been issued to prevent and prohibit Apple’s anti -discriminatory behavior and
Anticompetive pricing determination. There will not be constant attempts to interfere with Apple’s competition
Become “
Swini noted that the matter has been going on for four years, four months and 17 days.
“We will return to Fortatite next week to the USIOS App Store,” said Swini.
We have asked Apple’s comment. Gonzales Rogers wrote in his judgment, “The reaction to the credibility of Apple’s ruling stress came out after two sets of clear hearings, the truth came to light. Despite it, Apple, despite its responsibilities, failed the purpose of the order, and kept its decision to keep the lawsuit of apple. Not a tailor, the court ordered the preparation of real -time documents and eventually held the second set of hearing in 2025.
Summary: The judge wrote, “After a trial, the court found that Apple’s 30 % commission” allowed it to cut the supercompotato operating margin “and was not linked to the value of its intellectual property, and thus, it was not a matter of time before Apple was confronted, after which it was no longer a matter of reaction, after which it was no longer. It was done before, with nothing before.
He added, “Apple’s goal: maintain its contradictory revenue series. Two, the court forbade Apple to refuse the ability to communicate with developers, and directly to consumers, the other
Purchase procedures. Apple’s Response: Apply new obstacles and new requirements to increase
Friction and the entire page increases the “frightened” screens, static URL and rise in broken rates
Statements Apple Purpose: Eliminating Users of Purchase Alternative Opportunities and
Maintain its irreversible taxes. Finally, Apple tried to maintain revenue
The court’s order for direct disgrace to the court’s order.
The judge said that “in contrast to the testimony in Apple’s initial court,” the documents revealed that Apple knew exactly what he was doing and chose the most anti -comigher options at every turn.
The judge wrote, “To hide the truth, Alex Roman, vice president of finance, lie completely under the oath.” “Internally, Philip Shiller advocated that Apple had obeyed the order, but Tim Cook ignored Shiller and instead allowed the Chief Financial Officer Luka teacher and his finance team to appease it. Cook has made more evidence to make it clear to the evidence.”
In 2021, the judge found Apple in favor of the most distrustful issues, but he said Apple went too far when he told the developers that he could not promote low app store prices to users within his apps, which are subject to Apple’s 30 % fee. After the judge’s decision in 2021, Apple violated the law of no -confidence by the moving developers who were instructing consumers to reduce prices, both Apple and the epic appealed to the decision and the case went to the US Supreme Court. The court said that the judge’s decision was correct, which defeated the epic great.
But today the judge wrote, “This is a ruling, not negotiations. Once a party deliberately ignores a judicial order, there is no work. The essence of time is not tolerated.
This may indicate many game developers to follow epic sports and make Apple’s store’s own web shops or alternatives, which may open the flood paths because these developers can no longer be punished for trying to prevent 30 % of its fees by Apple.
Joist Van Dronnon, a famous analyst and author of the game industry The one above“This is the first time an US court has told Apple’s platform fee what is: Looking for rent. This does not mean that 30 % of kit will be eliminated, but that does not mean that the fee structure will face the maximum scrutiny, especially when it is clear, especially when it is clear.
“The court further found that Apple’s actions are a deliberate attempt to preserve its supercompatio margin. The profit that is really available in the competitive market is higher than that,” Van Daronin added.
And he concluded, “By proving that fare -to -fare treatment not only guarantees urban penalties but also possible criminal consequences, the court has dramatically changed the threat to the dominant platforms, since this example is not expected to be aimed at a series of conflicts by the adjoining markets. Can be remembered as a reproductive catalyst.