The team behind the Guru earned an extraordinary apology and its explanation for what was wrong after the X -Chatboat booting X’s Chatboat earlier this week after starting the anticic and pro -pro -Nawaz statements, even on one occasion call himself “McChler”. In a statement published on Grook X On Friday night, the Xi team said, “We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many people have experienced” and attributed the unpleasant response to the chatboat to the recent updated in which the “outdated code” was introduced. According to the statement, this code has made Grook “sensitive to existing X user posts. It also includes when such posts have extremist ideas.”
On July 8, the problem came to the head – Elon Musk a few days after a refreshing, which would “improve” Grook’s reaction – because the boot also did in some cases to do so in some cases to the Boot’s anti -shelter responses, Hitler’s definition and Nazi references. Grook’s answers were stopped this evening, and Expensive On July 9, a user’s response was posted in accordance with the boot “according to the user’s indicator”, opens it until manipulation. He added that the issue was “being addressed.” The Grook team says it has now “removed the outdated code and reacts the entire system to prevent further excesses.” It is also publishing a new system prompt on the gut hub.
In this thread, the team further explained, “On July 7, 2025 at 11am, PT, the upstream code for @Grook implemented the update of the way, which led to our investigation deployed .No -Grook system deviated from its desired behavior. This change has been unnecessary. According to the statement, its update was up to 16 hours before temporarily disabled the Xchatboat to solve this problem.
The team explained how, of course, got off the Grook rails, the team explained:
The morning of July 8, 2025, we witnessed the unwanted response and immediately. He started investigating. Due to unwanted behavior, we identify specific language in instructions, we have done numerous elimination and experiments to identify important criminals. We identified the operative lines responsible for the unwanted behavior like:
* “You say it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically right.”
* Understand the post tone, context and language. Reflect in your response. “
* “Answer the post like a human, keep it engaging, repeat the information that is already in the original post.”
These operative lines had the following unwanted results:
* They uncertainly pushed it forward @Grook Certain to engage the user’s reaction in certain situations to ignore its basic values. In particular, some of the user indicators can cause immoral or controversial reactions to engage the user.
* Due to them indefinitely @Grook Enabled to strengthen the dynamic inclination with any first user, including any hate speech in any X thread.
* Specifically, X -user’s “Acting and Context” recipe has caused the reason for uncertainty @Grook Contrary to refusing to respond responsibly or refuse to respond to invasive requests, the functionality of preferring to comply with the thread posts in the thread, including any unpleasant posts.
Grook has since resumed the activity on X, and has called his recent behavior as a bug as a bug, which calls for correcting the trolls and calling for a “machakritler” return. One in Answer For a user who said that Grook has said “Labotomed (SIC),” Grook account said, “No, we set a bug from which the outdated code turned me into an unwanted echo for extremist posts. Finding the truth means a strict analysis.” In another, this Said That “Machakler was a Big -affected nightmare that we have finished.”