O Art, nudity, spelling and pointing about politics
One author announced, “I do not read the authors who use AI art,” if they use AI art, I naturally assume that their writing is also. “
How interesting this deduction is. When an writer uses someone else’s art, does he also naturally assume that writing is someone else? When an author uses stock images, does he assume that the writing copy was pasted somewhere else? If the icon is common, does he assume that writing is normal? If the author uses his art but it is minor, does he assume that writing should be modest?
I doubt this. He was posting. That was a virtue signaling.
This is not to say that there are usually no legitimate ethical issues to discuss AI photos, or generally AI. Believe that there are. Seriously and actually posting on these issues.
Then there are haters of a sexy picture. I once posted a Vapatan photo with some philosophical view. Someone shared it for example “See what these women are doing to try to get readers!” The funny thing is that he got her readers by sharing it. I thought the photo with the quote was a philosophy for a Major who worked in strip clubs. But I don’t think he …