These days, the art developed AI looks seriously impressive.
With the correct indicator, you can find something that feels like a complete example structure, color, lighting.
But here’s the thing:
Even when the image is very good, it still feels… it is wrong to post it.
You upload it to a community, and someone says, “Oh, is this ai?”
Sometimes, people bring morality. For the second time, they completely ignore it.
Before going into the technical aspect of things,
I want to speak honestly from someone’s point of view that really uses this thing.
Whether you agree or not, I think it’s worth saying out loud.
What is AI developed art?
The art made from AI means asking the computer to ask the computer to attract something on the basis that he has learned from seeing other pictures.
It works like this:
People collect a large number of photos from the Internet and use them for AI training. Over time, AI starts recognizing patterns: what looks like a face, how the light works, what wear certain roles, etc.
Then, when you type in an application (such as “” Girl in a white dress parked in the jungle “), AI tries to create a new picture that is similar to this idea.
But many people here are confused.
Even if an AI model was released, December, December does not mean that he knows anything that has come out in November. Why? Because AI does not update itself in real time. All it knows is to know what was trained, and this training was probably months ago.
For example:
- If the training data expired in June, then whatever came out is probably not involved.
- Not everything is used on the Internet. Most AI Art models are specifically focused on anemic or 2D reflection mainly use images of specific sites such as DenburoWhich is organized and there are tags that help to understand AI what he is watching.
- Other sources such as Pixio or Gallburro can also be used, but not everything is included.
Also, even if something is online, it does not mean that AI has seen it. The creators of these models usually pick and clean the data before training, and they do not always tell us what they use.
So, how do you know that if an AI model can pull a particular character or style?
In fact, unless the developer tells you (which is rare), the best way is to try it on its own.
Type the character name and see what comes out. This is often the only way to find out.
What extent can AI art really go?
As stated earlier, AI image generation means
Training a model on existing photosFor, for, for,.
Then ask to create a new one based on your indicator.
With a simple example let me explain it more clearly.
A character + b mem = a new collection
Imagine:
- A Have a character
- B A meme is probably a pose, trend, or a special scene
If the AI model has learned both A and B during training,
Then it can make a picture of doing b
Even if no one has really drawn it before.
This is the magic of AI art: it is already known by combining pieces.
But what about C and D?
Now says:
- c Is a perfectly new character
- Di Have a new meme or pose
If the model was trained Ago C and D were present,
They are Not in the memory of the model It doesn’t know them.
You can try to explain them through indicators,
And depends on how powerful the model is,
You can find something close
But It will never be perfect.
Option 1: Laura Training (for local models)
If you are using A Local setup (Such as running a model on your computer or cloud server),
You can train a Strap Add a small custom to the model to teach AI C and D about D.
This method is very accurate and works very well.
What about cloud services?
Like services Noveli (NAI) Do not allow it.
Since they are completely cloud -based, you cannot edit the model nor upload your training data.
In other words: There is no lura on Nai.
You can hear about a platform like Civitai (https://civitai.com/Jes
They support Laura upload and training,
But they are completely different ecosystem.
CIVITAI doesn’t produce their model Model sharing platform.
Users upload their trained models, and others can use them.
Sevi also offers token services for you to create images or train luras.
Think of it as hosting a picture, with AI tools above.
So what can you do on NAI?
NAI offers a feature called vibeFor, for, for,.
Where you can upload a reference photo to help guide generation.
It helps, but it’s not perfect.
Waiting for the most reliable option The new model update.
For example, NAI’s V4 New training data and better breeding standards.
If VIBE is supported on V4, it can fill even more space.
But there are still limits
It doesn’t matter how nice the model is,
New character, new memes, and new art styles Will always appear.
Finally, even the latest model gets old.
And here’s another basic truth:
Ai can’t read your mind.
You cannot expect it to be every pixel, finger, shadow, or light
Exactly where you imagined it Not right now
Honest answer
Even today’s best AI models are still fair
Smart image combination machines.
If your expectations get high perfect pose, lighting, mood, anatomy
Ai will target his limits.
If you want something Really perfectOK with every detail?
Open Photoshop. Do yourself
For now, this is still the most reliable way.
My honest theory about the current status of AI art
To be two -to -day,
The art of AI is still in the mainstream.
It doesn’t matter what tools you use whether it be novel, local setup, midgrani, or Del E
AI photos are not widely accepted in the broader public place.
Especially when the big -language model technology around the faster growth and attention,
The scene of AI art is relatively small and neglected.
Most people know what about AI art
For the average individual, the knowledge of the pictures made from AI usually stops here:
- “Is it like putting e?”
- “Oh, you mean firefly thing in Adobe?”
- If they work in the media, they may have heard about the midwent
In other words, AI art is still considered a niche area, which only some groups are familiar with.
Even in the gaming industry, some companies have started using AI tools internally,
But none of them are open about it.
They know that public reaction can be negative.
And in cases where AI art is clearly used, it often appears
And the results are usually low standards and are not more successful.
Ottaco and in all Culture Communities
Mobile phones, games and for example, people are more familiar with AI art,
But the idea is usually negative.
Most 2D AI model was trained on photos Collected without the consent of artists
It is still a legal gray area in many countries,
But morally, it is difficult to justify it.
In these communities, Fan art is not just content that is culture.
Regardless of the level of skill, it is treated with respect.
From this point of view, even the most polished AI created examples
Is often seen Less meaningful than a simple handmade sketch.
This is the current fact.
So what am I trying to say?
No matter what platform you use
Whether it be NAI, local model, or something else
You need to understand one thing:
Most online spaces are still not welcomed by AI -made images.
It also applies to ordinary communities like gaming forums.
And from the point of view of the broader people, the reaction is often the case.
“Oh, did you make it with Ai? That’s interesting.”
And the conversation ends at this place.
Yes, there are some exceptions.
Some AI art works get real definition.
But these are rare cases Not normal.
“Sometimes AI art is defined” but only in some cases
Yes, that’s true.
Some AI -made images are appreciated.
But these are rare exceptions, and they usually fall into one of the following categories.
1. When people don’t realize that this is AI
The quality of the AI image has recently improved.
Some audiences are really stupid. Other people just want to admit that it is handmade.
But true, People who know the art can usually tell.
Whether it’s structural, strange fingers, contradictory lights, or unnatural details
AI photos still remove themselves.
Even if no one identifies it, that does not mean that they were convinced.
Sometimes, they just decide not to say anything.
If any AI picture looks Really Polished,
Have a good chance that someone has an art skill retouched After this generation.
2. When it is sexy
Let’s be honest, people pay attention to sexy content, AI or not.
He said, even here, Some people still reject it just because it is AI.
Hand -produced sexy sketches made with four dirty lines that clap,
While beautifully detailed AI artwork sometimes decreases.
In other words, even “porn appeal” AI is not so strong to protect art from prejudice.
3. When it is funny (Mem)
Sometimes the images of AI are unintentionally hilarious.
Strange face, broken anatomy, funny conditions can go viral as memes.
But beyond these particular matters,
Most AI -made art is found in dismissal or calm.
AI already has a negative impression in many places.
Trying to “reveal” the better quality without context, most of the matters are worsened.
In extreme cases, it can also end in conflict lists,
Like getting a section on Wiki for “AI Art Drama”.
The bottom line
Even if you have access to powerful tools
Premium services such as a well -trained lavera, a strong model, or novelist
This does not mean that you should wave around it.
If you are proud of what has been created,
Enjoy it for yourself Or
Share it with people who really understand AI art.
It is much better to find the right audience rather than fight the wrong.
From the next post, I will break the stable tools and indicators while detecting things.
Before we dive into real content,
Let me introduce me a little friend that will help me share everything.
They have no name yet, but they will be my reliable side kick in explaining things from here