Why are many creations easily penetrate on the idea of making AI art? What does an image, poem, film scene, in a chord mean? This discomfort is not merely aesthetic. This is existence.
We are associated with it Which means With Intention. No- A person – must be Meaning This poetry should express something Felt felt. Painting should show a memory or imagination or obsession. But AI does not mean “meaning”. It acts. It produces. And still, sometimes, result Feels feel Like meaning.
We (thousands of people) miss the old about Bigon Tech – how we note the phone numbers and at least two couple determined for memory, the abrasive sound of tapes and records, which was later used for a better digital audio technology to imitate in DJK Ham. But we do not usually do Usually This means technologies that improve it. No delayed impression is mournful at the loss of bad video games coded by humans. No one is bothered by AI that strengthens our phones, apps, or everyday digital experiences. We do not stop considering how many years of technological development, it is possible to order food, scroll and food in seconds. As long as it works, we are fine.
But somehow, Art And Design Take the burden of reminding us of your conscience. Being moral. Human human.
I’m not complaining – but I wonder: Why?
Why do we tolerate artistic creation a special kind of devotion? Why is the idea of AI influx painting more than an AI -coded calculator? Why does the absence of human communication in the song feel more like harmful in the absence of human error in your clock’s precision -related gears?
It seems that we still do not have the right language to explain this kind of writing. The thing that makes us irrelevant is not the standard of AI-generation work, but the absence of a Story Behind its creation, we can’t imagine what the machine is feeling. There is no harassing talented, no calm music, no political prejudice (at least by the machine) is the invention of real or behind the legends behind it.
But we have seen this movie before. The products once caused panic among the artists. Photography was seen as a threat to painting. Digital design as lack of crafts. History has taught us that new tools not only change how we create, but also how we interpret. Yuwal Noahi argued that AI is an agent, because of his ability to make decisions, there is no tool – and once again, there is a question of intention.
Perhaps AI-generation art is not merely devoid of meaning, but rather raises it Another type of meaning – A born individual intentions, but from Collected intelligence. These systems have been training human thought, shape, language and imagination for centuries. They have an output layer – not because they know what they are doing, but because we Do. We see ourselves in the mirror, but distorted.
The way is inside! As Javed Akhtar said to him, in the path of technical and financial development, it seems that some of our goods are left behind. Now we are looking for it. It is a cultural wisdom and enjoyment of life through art. We ran towards the number and forgot what really matter. If we want to give a sense of content created by AI- whether it is to filter humanity, or eliminate the run-off mill, or the AI-infinite content is equally accurate, we must first review the original treasures of the material and train our minds. This will help us to understand the scope and threats of content, so we can make it wisely, or consciously choose to walk away.