Refuses to sleep physics: a super heating experience remains solid at 14x at its melting location

In an important experiment, gold has denied expectations that it was solid even after the standard temperature was heated. With the help of rapid laser burst, scientists could warm gold beyond the destruction, which is a theoretical limit that needs to melt solid due to extreme heat. Surprisingly, the gold was temporarily in the structure, and then it was considered how the matter behaves when severe conditions were provided. Such a rare trend is known as super heating, where the heating system is so fast that the atoms do not get enough time to reorganize themselves in liquid.

Gold Intraps combines destruction: What is Super Hat?

As Science alertThe gold nuclear structure resisted melting and quickly absorbed the heat, faster than its nuclear response. Scientists conducted this study on 19,000 calories, and were solid for 2 packets, which is enough to challenge the theory of physics.

Traditionally, physicists believed that solids could not escape three times more heat than their melting location. This experience increased gold 14 times from the threshold with the help of modern techniques, Which included a reflection of X -ray To properly track heat absorption. These results show that materials can compete to melt beyond the first known limits. However, only for short moments, which are difficult to imagine.

Can other solid gold resist melting? What does this mean for future research

The consequences found by scientists do not change the law of thermodynamics. However, they suggest that such rules cannot be fully implemented in a very fast response, and that atoms cannot move or reset at this time. Most importantly, there was no place to go to gold, and it allows it to remain solid even after heating the unexpected temperature.

This unlocks the new possibilities that understand the extreme conditions, from the effects of the temptation to the nuclear reactors. Scientists now wonder if other solids can also show the same tolerance, and reject the existing model of melting locations, which need to be fully known. Science should look back on the question asked by a scientist how much hot can you make before melting?