- A Reddate user re -created a picture of rock 101 times with Chat GPT
- What began as a bad entertainment ended as an abstract art
- This trend is now facing some reactions due to the waste energy by producing 101 images in a short time.
There is now another new viral chattegot image generation, and it can be the most meaningless but still most humorous – especially when AI makes things horrible.
You may have seen the new “Prepare the exact copy of this syllable, don’t change anything“ In the past few days, point on social media, where the chatigoet tries to regenerate an image, often making fine changes that seem just a bit strange.
A Reddate user changed the tendency of Chat GPT to transform the icon of Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson, one of the most famous people on the planet, to some of the strange form of art, in which Picasso would have to rotate in his grave.
How did they do it? Chat GPT, 101 times to re -make the image, every time using the newly created AI creation as the starting point – you can watch the whole process in the reddate video below.
I tested “the exact copy of this icon, don’t change anything” 101 times, but with Dwayne Johnson. By r/chatgpt
This makes me feel disrespectful
What starts as a completely different but rocky fun entertainment is very strange because the chattegot replaces its clothes, then its mouth. Before you know it, all the identified features disappeared, causing a mess.
Redded threads, writing time, 42,000 opots and about 3,000 comments. My favorite is, “Chatgupat, like more chatted.”
From viral action data to convert your pet into a human, new trends for chat GPT image are popped daily. Here is a funny, often fun, but so meaningless, which takes social media every week through the storm.
This chat GPT trend is interesting. Yes, it produces horrible consequences, but it is interesting to see the evolution of AI’s ability to regenerate the imagery. At some point we will have an AI model that can not only regenerate near 1: 1, but if we call it 101 times to re -make the same picture, don’t create anything that looks like a technical on the canvas.
Response
These AI image trends are experiencing a growing amount of response, however, many people are worried about the effects of the AI -use on the planet for meaningless entertainment.
A Reddate user developed a thread of plead with AI community “Stop the trend of 100x image generation“.
In the post, the user writes @Gunz and Pumpkins, “Each image generation uses about 0.0 0.010 kW power. It is running immediately to burn 100 times through about 1 kW-it is enough to give a refrigerator a refrigerator or 20 cups of coffee.
“So here’s a simple asking: Maybe the time has come to let this trend go.”
I have a feeling that this will not happen for the last time when the GPT image trends will go viral, so we have to be in accordance with the effects of the use of AI servers for meaningless tasks. Nevertheless, what we do on the Internet uses energy to some extent, so where should we draw the line?