At the time of writing, I am writing an article about Picasso Gorenica. Instead, I’m writing this.
Encouragement Event: Adobe’s ads
During my recent time, I was browsing YouTube. Somewhere on the way, I inevitably went into an advertisement. Since I like art and sometimes talk about design, this algorithm has been fed my cut data. It has concluded that I can be interested in Adobe subscription.
I was not interested in any product they were pushing (like, no, no, Adobe, I don’t want to sign up for a year long membership that you are showing, only monthly, why do you ask?) But, in any case, I gave their advertisement a watch. Maybe it was out of a long -lasting maskist continuity? It’s difficult to say.
The ad was one of the Adobe PDF editors. I couldn’t tell you which one: The important thing that was visible in this ad was the capabilities of the AI ​​-based image generation of this product. It was not very disturbing itself. Love it or hate it, these days, even in commercial settings, such a feature is becoming increasingly common that it is no longer surprising itself.
In fact, it was the hint that used the ad that floor me.
“Summary modern art”.
And that’s exactly what AI created.
Only when I decided my piece Guerrica Just have to wait.
But why?
In the late 1880s(Or ​​from 1890-1920Who do you ask), Western art began to turn away from the natural reflection of the world around us, and instead began to focus more on symbols, personal expression, emotions and internal views. This movement was known after the effect.
Although it Will not Be the first time that some of these concepts were discovered in a major art movement, the works of leaders such as Givegen, Paul Kisan, and Vincent Van Goo were unique, and allowed human perception, feeling, and consciousness to discover the inner world of artists.
After that, it is not surprising that the effectiveness of the subsequent effectiveness of the effects, such as Expressionism, Cubism (which will play an important role in the development of Picasso’s cubesism. Guerrica An example), and yes – different forms of summary painting.
Perhaps things to make things more clear, the value of abstract art (and usually many other forms of sapotish art) is twice as:
- O.L, it allows us to experience the artist’s point of view, just as words are forbidden.
- Secondly, it allows us to experience (and consider and experience parts of our consciousness that otherwise cannot pay any attention.
As the artist’s intentions and viewers, the interaction between our reaction creates a dialogue that promotes debate, criticism, growth and further creation. Even when the artist ends, his intention remains, and in today’s context, this dialogue can always be renewed.
But when the artist was an Ai – a homoncoles is currently unable to be real emotional, liberal – half of that value is lost. The audience may still have their own reaction to this piece, but where does the artist intend?
AI does not face fear. It cannot experience the desire. It doesn’t know, the first hand, what its craving means, is to feel anxiety, spiritual contradiction, or any other feelings that an artist can work in an abstract piece of symbolic piece of humanitarian a piece of human condition.
AI may be able to describe or imitate such things, but does not feel them. And likewise where it leaves us, besides sitting, it stands in our own ideas of a sincere, spiritual creator in which any deliberate insight, a third dimension, is offered, in which we are experiencing?
Can such an art be incompetent to see us from our point of view, or can it only eat in the digital era algorithmic eco -chambers?
On the implementation of artistic AI
All said, I don’t think the biggest problem is whether AI is or not Can Make art. The problem is whether or not a human being Will stop asking to be asked. Let’s imagine yourself in a corporate environment, this is the place where people usually use paid software such as Adobe. If a piece of abstract art can be developed by AI, which is considered professionally acceptable, and then used commercially, how do you think it will have an impact on the livelihood of future artists?
And these are not just future artists who lose in this matter. Try to engage with any abstract, AI-invaluable image beyond “Ou, beautiful picture”, and what do you get? You may expect to talk about the soul, but what you find is a lonely, invasive mirror.
Or glorify wall paper.
Or the best – a luxurious hivemind. If you manage to look at any person at any other end, it is responsible for becoming some of the most working coordinator in their sixth cup coffee, which has been pressured to use AI prompt to meet your project requirements on a classetrophobic budget and deadline.
In other words, if you try to engage the heart deeply with AI art, the thing with which you always encounter is not a relief, or instead of spreading and crushing: a corporate shortcut has been presented in dynamic colors, and no such thing has been developed.
It is art that does not really say anything. It just shines.
And yet the saplus movements were never about “dizziness”. They were about the unseen – about the experiences that create our lives despite being unaware and unclear. Even abstract AI works that get closer to this trend, such as This oneJust as far as they do, they already open a dialogue with powerful human music, which gives us a new way of imagery.
However, they do not mean anything.
And that is why, in my opinion, relying on the AI ​​to create imagery that imitates the impression of the impression, and the effort beyond that is naturally developed with deadly food.
A warning and some closing ideas
Now, it is different if you, as an artist, set the color, shapes, symbols and self -made, and just use AI to apply image filters or so on (such as you see more painting more paintings to create a 3D model), but it’s not a conversation or discussion that is now equipped to enter.
To me, such a technique is equivalent to implementing digital photo effects – which still needs to be disclosed in terms of context, and it can still be creative crutches in the hands of non -skilled… but nevertheless, an artist can be deliberately used to know what he is doing.
Nevertheless, there are many people who will not recognize the difference between such techniques, and I have been criticizing AI’s soulmate, completely productive use. In the hands of non -skilled, it may not be the difference.