Unexpected poetry of Ai Art
In collaboration with Claude Swant 4
Photo: You stand in a gallery, transferred through a painting that seems to breathe with life. The colors revolve around the patterns that feel both familiar and impossible. Your heart runs a little. Then you read the play card – “Created by AI.”
The earth turns under your feet.
This is no longer a science fiction. This is Tuesday afternoon at your local Art Museum, and what you thought you knew about creativity is just inside.
Deep Fake Nisen. Sania (or: I learned how to quit and love the algorithm)
Refrigerated anadol’s “machine halochination” does not hang on the wall – it Is alive There are breaths, pulses, real times in the installation. The data becomes a poetry, which makes you forget to check your phone straight for twenty minutes.
Meanwhile, the Open Jok Box composed the symphons that it seems as if it emerged from a parallel universe where Bethon had access to the time machine and was really good Wi -Fi. The lyrics are tumultuously familiar but are completely strangers – as in your childhood Lolibi has been sung by someone who was never a child.
And then there is a “basement”, where stories are based on your desire, which creates a statement from which they choose your own adventure books like grocery lists.
But this is the place where it is interesting (and legally funny): Who owns these digital dreams?
Past in copyright machine
There is a crisis in the world of art, and it is dirty in a very delicious way. When “Edmund de Belami” sold in Christie in 2 432,500 in 2018, it was not just a painting that was a hand -changing hand – it was the whole idea of ​​the author that he was the perfect concept of auctioning the most bidder.
The AI ​​Act (which is a vast piece of European Legislature that is trying to put into accumulation of artificial intelligence) continues to throw phrases like “human surveillance” and “transparency requirements”. But what happens when the typing in your supervision contains “paint me something beautiful” and the machine’s birthplace consisting of the Sustaine Chapel looks like a dodel?
Trevor Paglon gets. His AI-assisted tasks do not just make art-he inquires of systems that create art. It is a meta that makes your brain itching in good ways. He is not just using AI as a fancy paint brush. It is being intended with her surveillance, strength, and what she means.
Then there is a viral “Ai Sinfield” on the Tweich-an endless stream of humor developed by the computer, which is more unrealistic than the original (and it is saying something). It went up to 24/7 until he said nothing inappropriate and was banned, which is probably the most humanitarian work ever by AI.
When the originality becomes complicated
Here’s what keeps me at night: nerve networks just do not copy and paste. They eat artistic elements, digest them in their silicon’s stomach, and birth something that has never existed before. It is like you eat the history of digital God and dream of new colors.
But those new colors? They are built on the bones of every artist who ever lived, whose work was fed without permission to slip or royalty checks. Getty Images are being prosecuted for this reason – Stability AI – millions of copyright images were allegedly used without consent for training AI models that now compete with artists whose work taught them to create.
Rotate to catch the legal system. The US Copyright’s Office continues to revise its stance on the AI ​​author, as a teenager changes the status of his relationship. Can an algorithm hold a copyright? Can you paten a dream? Can a machine be cursed if it does not know what the meaning is meant to?
Freedom and Sue
For artists wishing to accept chaos, AI is not replacing creativity – this is a rocket fuel for it. Imagine creating a thousand architectural concepts before lunch, or visual ideas at the speed of thinking. Except for pure creative exploration, a hard mixing is mixed.
But with great strength, there is a great deal of paperwork. Every AI Infield masterpiece takes ghosts of his training statistics, and lawyers are taking notice. The theory of fair use is becoming thinner than the Fellow pastry, and no one knows where it will take away.
In Art Basel, the AI-Assisted work award is winning and breaking the convention. Artists are cooperating with machines in ways that looked like magic a decade ago. But magic, as any lawyer will tell you, is notorious for copyright.
Cultural earthquake
Look around AI Infield Music Videos are becoming more rapidly than cats of cats. Interactive Story Steeling Games are developing stories that make your choice, your mood, your heart rate in real time. Digital influences like Lil Macilla are making music and modeling fabrics, unless the distinction is meaningless, the line between real and artificial is blurring.
The “Theatry D-Opra Local” dispute (where AI-Infield piece won the arts contest) was not just about justice-it was about identity. If a machine can win an art competition, what do human artists make? Increased helplessness? Something new?
Navigating the beautiful dirt
The AI ​​Act wants transparency, accountability, moral guidelines. It wants to know how when an algorithm creates something when you see the world. But responsibility is a human concept, and these machines dream in the languages ​​outside our jurisdiction.
The real question is not whether AI can produce art. It is whether the creativity is going to re -establish itself so completely that our current discussions will look passionate. Such as argue about whether the automobiles should need to walk with a red flag.
What makes me the most enthusiastic is not a technology – it is watching the boat of humanity that makes us human. Every AI breed painting forces us to ask: What is the creativity? Every algorithmic symphony surprises us: What is beauty? Every Deep Fix Installation Wisdom: What is the truth?
Answers are still being written, pixel by pixel, notes by note, a lawsuit through legal action.
And machines? They just dream, remain indifferent to our category, create impossible things in colors that do not have names.
The revolution will not be televised. It will be prepared in the middle of 1,024.