I am not an expert in Generative AI models, but I think I am very good to understand how they work and how they work. It goes like this:
A model is fed billions of images that labeled the things in them. Over time, through the model, data analysis, it learns that the pixel given given the color goes to a particular place, according to the label. After that, you can start with the label, and it will create a new picture about which he thinks the best fits. Obviously I am shining in a lot of detail, but they are wide strokes.
Now, where do billions of pictures come from? Why, the Internet, of course the whole Internet. If you have ever posted a picture anywhere on the Internet, it is almost certain that your photo is in a training datastate for these models.
Being a traditional artist today requires online presence. If people do not see your job, they do not get your services nor buy your work, and social media is the place where people are nowadays. So you, the working artist, post your work on social media because this is the only way you can make money.
Now, a large corporation, which is flushed with VC cache, stealthily eliminates every photo you posted. They do not tell you, and they do not give you any choice in this matter. The terms of service for these sites do not ban this use, and in some cases it clearly allows it. Suddenly, photos made are popped everywhere. Some of them have suspicious similarity that you can make. You realize that, instead of hiring services to make your art, are saying a machine that looks like you, and paying a large corporation to pay it. Because it’s fast! And cheap!
I don’t know how you will feel, but I will feel like taking an ax in Dell E servers.
You’ve heard about the Inkni Valley. When something looks Almost Man – it’s very close – but something about it Off This situation often creates a very strong sense of humor and anxiety. That is why we do not like a lifetime robots and dolls – the closer they look for a human being, the more trouble they create us.
AI art also triggers an unusual valley, just because there is something else Feels feel Almost human. But Not enough. There is something about the AI ​​art, and these are not just fungilers and milestones faces.
Even when the AI ​​art manages to lose the Valley, it feels like a trick. If you see a piece of cool art, just later to know that this AI was born, you feel cheated. You were ready to appreciate human vision, skill and hard work. But they didn’t make it. He told a machine to make it, and misled you about who was crediting. It is emotionally manipulated, and people don’t like it.
Research has been done in which something has been said as 50 % of the content on the Internet is still e -influx. In the coming years, what you believe in your estimates depends on something like 90 %.
Now, I like another. Oreo food is a delicious experience. But it is harassed to forcibly feed a million Oros. AI feels like a tip of the material fed and fed. This is endless. It is tiring. No need to mention, as I said in the back, every piece feels like it is trying to make you manipulated for a riot. I’m trying to decide how I should feel about every piece of AI content, and more and more every day.
There is even worse aspect. Ai slopes are not just tired – this is dangerous. Are some of AI’s biggest generative Original Trying to deceive you. He is a scammer, spammer and conspiratorial pedal. They are Russian content forms that are trying to manipulate your politics. With these generative AI tools, the bar is on the floor to produce false information of the proud sound. It is easy and fast to create, and difficult and difficult to find about what is in fact.
Anger against the Bangasi Grandpaism machine. Voine. These artists were trying to make a statement (and are still) Against the current power structure. It’s not just pictures or itself a sound – it is the context in which it was made. It is How They were made. At this point, their message has the power.
Imagine that if Banksi used a midwife to produce its stencils. Will anyone pay attention to his message?
“Medium is a message,” said Marshal McLahan. If you want to make a statement, but it cannot be bothered to say yourself, why should anyone listen? If its creation feeds the corporate machine, the art cannot be rebellious. If art is controlled by some united companies, art cannot be individuality. Art can not be self -expressing if you need a lot of words beyond some words in an indicator.
I have seen the mountains of AI slopes over the past one year. But I have also catching some interesting, beautiful, impressive work in the AI. I think Ai, Well done.Human creativity is capable of helping. Remember the warning – Well done.
How do we fix AI?
I have some ideas.
- Be transparent. If you use AI, do not show that you don’t. Clearly identify which parts of your work AI were born. Don’t lie by mistake.
- The change happens. The current copyright law is an exception where the previous tasks can be given a new copyright or if they are largely, they can be released from their previous rights. ReverseIf they have a new job, they have a new job. Let’s do the same with AI output Shift With our own hands, it is enough that it becomes completely his own.
- Place it in a public domain. Raw AI results, without human change, should be public property, because at present, AI is the main author. Since AI cannot claim copyright, no one can.
- Your data is your property. We need a new sample around data and data scraping. Nowadays the data is incredibly valuable, and producers of all this data (US) get a raw contract in return. Free use of drug addicts that eliminate our mental health and social harmony, interference advertising, confidential death, and now, tools that change our hard work. We need data scraping to be opt -in instead of opt -out. We need reservations and/or compensation for those whose work has trained AI without their knowledge or consent. Here is enough for another other article, but for now, remember your data You should belong.
- Sometimes take a kick pencil. Traditionally art is good for your soul, and it does not require large -scale computing forms that suck a lot of strength and water. Sometimes make it an old age. Remember the happiness and satisfaction of seeing a piece that are fully combined under your own strength.
He says technology is morally neutral. Ethics come to how you use it. I don’t think it’s completely true. I think Ai Ease To use immorally and Difficult To really use morally. But this is not impossible. And if it is to stay here, it is important to know how.