A 2020 hack Finnish’s mental health company, which has access to the treatment of tens of thousands of clients, has a warning. The people on the list were blackmailed, and then all the work was publicly released, which revealed highly sensitive details such as abuse and addiction experiences with children.
The therapists stand to lose
In addition to the violation of data privacy, other risks include when psychotherapists consult a LLM on behalf of a client. Studies have shown that although there are some special therapy boats Can be competitors Human intervention, Chat GPT’s choice can do more damage than good.
A Recent study of Stanford UniversityFor example, it is found that chat boats can promote their deception and psychological treatment by closing their eyes instead of challenging a user, as well as engaging in bias and engaging in psychofancy. The same flaws can be dangerous to consult the physicians with chat boats by their clients. For example, they can baselessly verify a physician’s hach, or go on the wrong path.
Egelira says he has played with tools like Chat GPT while teaching mental health -trained people, such as entering fake symptoms and diagnosing AI chatboat. He says the device will create many possible conditions, but it is thin in its analysis. American Counseling Association Suggests At this time AI will not be used to diagnose mental health.
A Study It was published in 2024 of the first version of the Chat GPT as well as it was found that it was really vague and common to be useful in developing diagnosis or treatment plans, and it was too much to prejudice to people that people could find academic behavior against other types of therapy that could be more appropriate.
Columbia University psychologist and neuro scientist, Daniel Kamel, conducted experiments with Chat GPT where he had a relative’s problems as a client. He says that when it was talked about “stock in trade” treatment, chatboat is a decent imitation, such as normalizing and verifying, seeking additional information, or highlighting some academic or emotional associations.
However, “he didn’t dig too much,” he says. He did not try to add “apparently or superficially irrelevant things together … to come with the story, idea, theory.
He says, “I will have doubts about your use of it for you.” They say, thinking that the physicians should be the job.
Morris says therapists can save time using AI -powered tech, but this advantage should be weighed against patients’ needs: “You may be saving yourself a couple of minutes. But what are you giving?”