My first glance at AI painting took my breath away. It looked like magical art without an artist. Just take a few words, and in the case of seconds, a picture of a picture or dream emerges. It was a matter of God for me because I never succeeded in getting anything similar to any decent sketch. For the first time, my own hands managed to make an image with balanced colors and some beautiful recipes.
The longer I observed and the more I came into being, the more I felt. There was a shortage of some. The picture was very polished and the truth about life was seen, but still there is a strange falsehood with it. It was like getting stuck inside a dream: so close to seeing the truth that you recognize it, but never strong to believe it.
Over time, this anxiety has increased. Many people who once praised AI art now feel resistance, even sheer enmity. And I understand why?
1. Why AI’s pictures feel “off”
Our eyes and minds are very sensitive entities. We respond to the smallest contradictions. A hand that turns inappropriately, a face that looks a little far away. Great painters only take the time and weeks of the details of the details of the details that we will take notice of for a moment. Their works look slow.
Me, however, will fail on a minor request for investigation. From afar, it looks really impressive. But now your magic looks at it. The charming, sad and strange thing is less attractive.
The lack of planner depth is not just a technical. This is because of the fact that art acts as meaningful. I think when I stand before a painting, a portion of it thinks about the artist’s process. It is a brush that is shaking before the stroke, and the color selection above the other mebi remains unless the mistakes make. Art is not about the last image. This is a very human journey behind it.
Once an image is known to be born in seconds, the moment of contact is lost. It may look like a painting, but it does not feel like anyone.
2. Unexalized weight of effort
For the creators, the rise of Ai feels severe. Many artists spend many years in training their hands and minds, just imitating their crafts in seconds to see the algorithm. The imbalance is clear: Measurement skills against machine speed and market convenience.
What is worse is that the environment of art begins to change itself. Quick content becomes normal. People learn to expect an art that is faster, cheap and shallow. A student who reads the drawing by copying AI references is not learning the discipline of art – they are learning shortcuts without roots.
It is not difficult to imagine a future where traditional painting feels like a dangerous process, the way we appreciate the hand -made textile or calligraphy, but in everyday life, they are rarely pursued. This thinking hurts many artists deeply.
3. Why AI still needs humans
For all criticism, I still do not think that AI is useless. The problem is not far away in technology, but how we position it.
AI is not an artist. This is a device. Imagine an automatic knife in the kitchen. Any amateur can open it and cut the meat into clean, even in size pieces. This will look helpful and very professional. But of course, no one ever thinks about calling this knife a chef. All the artist goes into prescription, spice, time, and hands that turn into food to remember raw ingredients.
Similarly, AI can accelerate some special process in making imagery. It can be a means to create rapid ideas and quick drafts and thus open unconventional options or variations that we have never considered. The real creative circle, creation itself, is still based on human vision, emotion, and deliberately incomplete.
4. The deep value of human art
Therefore, human voices are still discovered by the general public and AI can be gauged very well. Certainly, the pitch perfect songs may look amazing, but the sounds of cracks, breaths and raw emotions can tear into one’s heart.
The same is the case with visual art. In addition to the eye -catching icon, we want to understand a person behind it, weigh the influence of the one million choices given by the artist, to feel perseverance and experience the spirit of creation. This is something that AI can never do.
What can be done, if allowed, increasing the hand -handed hands, removing work around the world and giving more freedom to experience artists, so their minds can focus on real things: imagination and expression.
5. A balanced future
The future of art is not human against AI. These humans and AI are working together. When AI is kept as a partner instead of a competitor, we will continue to expand the creative spectrum without losing ourselves.
This is an important spirit in choosing the tools working with us. For example, Nano bananasFor, for, for,. Chat GPTFor, for, for,. Tools running from Flux ContexAnd other productive AI platforms are tools that help me to rotate with mental storms, different styles, and ideas that I will never think about handling. It’s flexible and easy to use, and definitely chooses to choose me.
So, if you only feel torn between rejecting AI and embracing it, the middle may work for you. Don’t expect that AI will give you the spirit of art so don’t stop this option completely. Try it, see what sparks are, and find out how it works for you.
However, the speed and perfection have never been the acts of art. The only story that can potentially be told by a human being.